: 0 - C LEU 455 CG VS J PHE 113 CE1 Distance: 5.471153 - Hydrophobic, 1 - C LEU 455 CG VS J PHE 113 CZ Distance: 4.944037 - Hydrophobic, 2 - C LEU 455 CD1 VS J PHE 113 CE2 Distance: 5.149720 - Hydrophobic, 3 - C LEU 455 CD1 VS J PHE 113 CZ Distance: 4.897499 - Hydrophobic, 4 - C LEU 455 CD2 VS J PHE 113 CD1 Distance: 5.180959 - Hydrophobic, 5 - C LEU 455 CD2 VS J PHE 113 CE1 Distance: 4.125597 - Hydrophobic, 6 - C LEU 455 CD2 VS J PHE 113 CE2 Distance: 4.728853 - Hydrophobic, 7 - C LEU 455 CD2 VS J PHE 113 CZ Distance: 3.842920 - Hydrophobic, 8 - C GLU 484 CG VS J TYR 109 CE1 Distance: 4.459573 - Hydrophobic, 9 - C GLU 484 CG VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 5.476108 - Hydrophobic, 10 - C GLU 484 OE2 VS J TYR 109 OH Distance: 3.654015 - Hydrogen Bonds, 11 - C GLU 484 CG VS J TYR 110 CD1 Distance: 5.013632 - Hydrophobic, 12 - C GLU 484 CG VS J TYR 110 CE1 Distance: 4.462441 - Hydrophobic, 13 - C GLY 485 N VS J TYR 109 OH Distance: 3.763208 - Hydrogen Bonds, 14 - C GLY 485 O VS J TYR 109 OH Distance: 3.398064 - Hydrogen Bonds, 15 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J ALA 64 CB Distance: 5.305591 - Hydrophobic, 16 - C PHE 486 CG VS J ALA 66 CB Distance: 4.656584 - Hydrophobic, 17 - C PHE 486 CD1 VS J ALA 66 CB Distance: 4.300526 - Hydrophobic, 18 - C PHE 486 CD2 VS J ALA 66 CB Distance: 4.425553 - Hydrophobic, 19 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J ALA 66 CB Distance: 3.666600 - Hydrophobic, 20 - C PHE 486 CE2 VS J ALA 66 CB Distance: 3.812840 - Hydrophobic, 21 - C PHE 486 CZ VS J ALA 66 CB Distance: 3.387109 - Hydrophobic, 22 - C PHE 486 CB VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 5.003958 - Hydrophobic, 23 - C PHE 486 CG VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 4.108233 - Hydrophobic, 24 - C PHE 486 CG VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.676371 - Hydrophobic, 25 - C PHE 486 CG VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.978304 - Aromatic Stacking, 26 - C PHE 486 CG VS J TYR 110 CD2 Distance: 4.692322 - Hydrophobic, 27 - C PHE 486 CD1 VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 4.283339 - Hydrophobic, 28 - C PHE 486 CD1 VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.430539 - Hydrophobic, 29 - C PHE 486 CD1 VS J TYR 110 CD1 Distance: 5.450081 - Hydrophobic, 30 - C PHE 486 CD1 VS J TYR 110 CD2 Distance: 4.080937 - Hydrophobic, 31 - C PHE 486 CD1 VS J TYR 110 CE2 Distance: 4.866839 - Hydrophobic, 32 - C PHE 486 CD2 VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 3.702725 - Hydrophobic, 33 - C PHE 486 CD2 VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.614636 - Hydrophobic, 34 - C PHE 486 CD2 VS J TYR 110 CD2 Distance: 4.733856 - Hydrophobic, 35 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 4.090348 - Hydrophobic, 36 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.111657 - Hydrophobic, 37 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J TYR 110 CD1 Distance: 5.296346 - Hydrophobic, 38 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J TYR 110 CD2 Distance: 3.437290 - Hydrophobic, 39 - C PHE 486 CE1 VS J TYR 110 CE2 Distance: 4.221718 - Hydrophobic, 40 - C PHE 486 CE2 VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 3.476014 - Hydrophobic, 41 - C PHE 486 CE2 VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.309993 - Hydrophobic, 42 - C PHE 486 CE2 VS J TYR 110 CD2 Distance: 4.193530 - Hydrophobic, 43 - C PHE 486 CE2 VS J TYR 110 CE2 Distance: 5.424290 - Hydrophobic, 44 - C PHE 486 CZ VS J TYR 110 CB Distance: 3.687253 - Hydrophobic, 45 - C PHE 486 CZ VS J TYR 110 CG Distance: 4.046732 - Hydrophobic, 46 - C PHE 486 CZ VS J TYR 110 CD1 Distance: 5.382794 - Hydrophobic, 47 - C PHE 486 CZ VS J TYR 110 CD2 Distance: 3.503909 - Hydrophobic, 48 - C PHE 486 CZ VS J TYR 110 CE2 Distance: 4.548403 - Hydrophobic, 49 - C CYS 488 O VS J TYR 109 OH Distance: 2.939252 - Hydrogen Bonds, 50 - C TYR 489 N VS J TYR 109 OH Distance: 4.423917 - Hydrogen Bonds, 51 - C TYR 489 CB VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 4.763753 - Hydrophobic, 52 - C TYR 489 CG VS J TYR 109 CG Distance: 5.214998 - Aromatic Stacking, 53 - C TYR 489 CG VS J TYR 109 CD2 Distance: 4.929127 - Hydrophobic, 54 - C TYR 489 CG VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 4.192591 - Hydrophobic, 55 - C TYR 489 CD1 VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 5.149006 - Hydrophobic, 56 - C TYR 489 CD2 VS J TYR 109 CG Distance: 4.683712 - Hydrophobic, 57 - C TYR 489 CD2 VS J TYR 109 CD1 Distance: 5.159167 - Hydrophobic, 58 - C TYR 489 CD2 VS J TYR 109 CD2 Distance: 3.668307 - Hydrophobic, 59 - C TYR 489 CD2 VS J TYR 109 CE1 Distance: 4.806889 - Hydrophobic, 60 - C TYR 489 CD2 VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 3.145159 - Hydrophobic, 61 - C TYR 489 CE1 VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 5.272791 - Hydrophobic, 62 - C TYR 489 CE2 VS J TYR 109 CG Distance: 4.841284 - Hydrophobic, 63 - C TYR 489 CE2 VS J TYR 109 CD2 Distance: 3.630826 - Hydrophobic, 64 - C TYR 489 CE2 VS J TYR 109 CE1 Distance: 5.429645 - Hydrophobic, 65 - C TYR 489 CE2 VS J TYR 109 CE2 Distance: 3.336880 - Hydrophobic, 66 - C TYR 489 OH VS J GLY 111 N Distance: 4.823381 - Hydrogen Bonds, 67 - C TYR 489 OH VS J GLY 111 O Distance: 4.040887 - Hydrogen Bonds, 68 - C TYR 489 OH VS J GLY 112 N Distance: 3.957691 - Hydrogen Bonds, 69 - C PHE 490 N VS J TYR 109 OH Distance: 4.426209 - Hydrogen Bonds, 70 - C GLN 493 CB VS J PHE 113 CZ Distance: 5.308434 - Hydrophobic, 71 - C GLN 493 CG VS J PHE 113 CE1 Distance: 5.347995 - Hydrophobic, 72 - C GLN 493 CG VS J PHE 113 CZ Distance: 4.843288 - Hydrophobic,