ANTIVIRAL PROTEIN/IMMUNE SYSTEM CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE SARS-COV-2 RBD IN COMPLEX WITH BD-604 FAB AND BD-368-2 FAB: 0 - L ILE 2 CB VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 4.917891 - Hydrophobic, 1 - L ILE 2 CG1 VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 4.868716 - Hydrophobic, 2 - L ILE 2 CG1 VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 3.753337 - Hydrophobic, 3 - L ILE 2 CD1 VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 4.977307 - Hydrophobic, 4 - L ILE 2 CD1 VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 4.176457 - Hydrophobic, 5 - L GLN 27 O VS R GLY 502 N Distance: 3.439631 - Hydrogen Bonds, 6 - L GLN 27 OE1 VS R GLY 502 N Distance: 4.824742 - Hydrogen Bonds, 7 - L GLN 27 OE1 VS R VAL 503 N Distance: 3.383660 - Hydrogen Bonds, 8 - L GLN 27 OE1 VS R GLY 504 N Distance: 3.919275 - Hydrogen Bonds, 9 - L GLN 27 CB VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 5.449052 - Hydrophobic, 10 - L GLN 27 CB VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 5.314597 - Hydrophobic, 11 - L GLY 28 N VS R THR 500 O Distance: 4.892504 - Hydrogen Bonds, 12 - L GLY 28 O VS R ASN 501 N Distance: 4.729240 - Hydrogen Bonds, 13 - L GLY 28 O VS R ASN 501 ND2 Distance: 4.785838 - Hydrogen Bonds, 14 - L GLY 28 O VS R GLY 502 N Distance: 3.158710 - Hydrogen Bonds, 15 - L ILE 29 CB VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 5.219752 - Hydrophobic, 16 - L ILE 29 CB VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 5.269763 - Hydrophobic, 17 - L ILE 29 CG2 VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 4.541617 - Hydrophobic, 18 - L ILE 29 CG2 VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 4.299358 - Hydrophobic, 19 - L SER 30 OG VS R GLY 496 O Distance: 3.213551 - Hydrogen Bonds, 20 - L SER 30 N VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 4.826111 - Hydrogen Bonds, 21 - L SER 30 O VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 4.507955 - Hydrogen Bonds, 22 - L SER 30 OG VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 4.218937 - Hydrogen Bonds, 23 - L SER 30 OG VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 2.946223 - Hydrogen Bonds, 24 - L SER 30 N VS R ASN 501 OD1 Distance: 3.811232 - Hydrogen Bonds, 25 - L SER 30 OG VS R ASN 501 OD1 Distance: 4.633339 - Hydrogen Bonds, 26 - L SER 31 OG VS R TYR 449 OH Distance: 4.650115 - Hydrogen Bonds, 27 - L SER 31 OG VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 4.463899 - Hydrogen Bonds, 28 - L ASP 32 OD1 VS R ARG 403 NH1 Distance: 6.880462 - Attractive, 29 - L ASP 32 OD2 VS R ARG 403 CZ Distance: 6.515297 - Attractive, 30 - L ASP 32 OD2 VS R ARG 403 NH1 Distance: 5.264309 - Attractive, 31 - L SER 67 OG VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 2.990142 - Hydrogen Bonds, 32 - L SER 67 OG VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 3.246675 - Hydrogen Bonds, 33 - L GLY 68 N VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 4.178613 - Hydrogen Bonds, 34 - L GLN 90 OE1 VS R TYR 505 OH Distance: 3.950633 - Hydrogen Bonds, 35 - L GLN 90 NE2 VS R TYR 505 OH Distance: 3.193437 - Hydrogen Bonds, 36 - L ASN 92 O VS R ARG 403 NE Distance: 4.834360 - Hydrogen Bonds, 37 - L ASN 92 O VS R ARG 403 NH1 Distance: 2.975028 - Hydrogen Bonds, 38 - L ASN 92 O VS R ARG 403 NH2 Distance: 3.211701 - Hydrogen Bonds, 39 - L ASN 92 OD1 VS R LYS 417 NZ Distance: 3.448403 - Hydrogen Bonds, 40 - L ASN 92 OD1 VS R TYR 453 OH Distance: 3.490608 - Hydrogen Bonds, 41 - L ASN 92 ND2 VS R TYR 453 OH Distance: 3.611940 - Hydrogen Bonds, 42 - L ASP 94 OD1 VS R ARG 403 NH2 Distance: 6.242666 - Attractive, 43 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 403 NE Distance: 6.752498 - Attractive, 44 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 403 CZ Distance: 6.250757 - Attractive, 45 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 403 NH2 Distance: 5.003904 - Attractive, 46 - L ASP 94 OD1 VS R ASP 405 OD1 Distance: 5.210767 - Repulsive, 47 - L ASP 94 OD1 VS R ASP 405 OD2 Distance: 5.866516 - Repulsive, 48 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ASP 405 OD1 Distance: 3.767946 - Repulsive, 49 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ASP 405 OD2 Distance: 4.085087 - Repulsive, 50 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 408 NE Distance: 6.666237 - Attractive, 51 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 408 CZ Distance: 6.657097 - Attractive, 52 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 408 NH2 Distance: 6.166176 - Attractive,