ANTIVIRAL PROTEIN/IMMUNE SYSTEM CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE SARS-COV-2 RBD IN COMPLEX WITH BD-604 FAB AND BD-368-2 FAB: 0 - L ILE 2 CB VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 4.918182 - Hydrophobic, 1 - L ILE 2 CG1 VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 4.868912 - Hydrophobic, 2 - L ILE 2 CG1 VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 3.753789 - Hydrophobic, 3 - L ILE 2 CD1 VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 4.977380 - Hydrophobic, 4 - L ILE 2 CD1 VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 4.177220 - Hydrophobic, 5 - L GLN 27 O VS R GLY 502 N Distance: 3.440019 - Hydrogen Bonds, 6 - L GLN 27 OE1 VS R GLY 502 N Distance: 4.824389 - Hydrogen Bonds, 7 - L GLN 27 OE1 VS R VAL 503 N Distance: 3.383973 - Hydrogen Bonds, 8 - L GLN 27 OE1 VS R GLY 504 N Distance: 3.919316 - Hydrogen Bonds, 9 - L GLN 27 CB VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 5.448745 - Hydrophobic, 10 - L GLN 27 CB VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 5.315103 - Hydrophobic, 11 - L GLY 28 N VS R THR 500 O Distance: 4.892584 - Hydrogen Bonds, 12 - L GLY 28 O VS R ASN 501 N Distance: 4.729381 - Hydrogen Bonds, 13 - L GLY 28 O VS R ASN 501 ND2 Distance: 4.786064 - Hydrogen Bonds, 14 - L GLY 28 O VS R GLY 502 N Distance: 3.159358 - Hydrogen Bonds, 15 - L ILE 29 CB VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 5.220246 - Hydrophobic, 16 - L ILE 29 CB VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 5.270710 - Hydrophobic, 17 - L ILE 29 CG2 VS R TYR 505 CD2 Distance: 4.541776 - Hydrophobic, 18 - L ILE 29 CG2 VS R TYR 505 CE2 Distance: 4.300039 - Hydrophobic, 19 - L SER 30 OG VS R GLY 496 O Distance: 3.212681 - Hydrogen Bonds, 20 - L SER 30 N VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 4.825877 - Hydrogen Bonds, 21 - L SER 30 O VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 4.507912 - Hydrogen Bonds, 22 - L SER 30 OG VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 4.218799 - Hydrogen Bonds, 23 - L SER 30 OG VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 2.946567 - Hydrogen Bonds, 24 - L SER 30 N VS R ASN 501 OD1 Distance: 3.811250 - Hydrogen Bonds, 25 - L SER 30 OG VS R ASN 501 OD1 Distance: 4.633215 - Hydrogen Bonds, 26 - L SER 31 OG VS R TYR 449 OH Distance: 4.650375 - Hydrogen Bonds, 27 - L SER 31 OG VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 4.464522 - Hydrogen Bonds, 28 - L ASP 32 OD1 VS R ARG 403 NH1 Distance: 6.880518 - Attractive, 29 - L ASP 32 OD2 VS R ARG 403 CZ Distance: 6.515483 - Attractive, 30 - L ASP 32 OD2 VS R ARG 403 NH1 Distance: 5.264630 - Attractive, 31 - L SER 67 OG VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 2.990105 - Hydrogen Bonds, 32 - L SER 67 OG VS R GLN 498 NE2 Distance: 3.246630 - Hydrogen Bonds, 33 - L GLY 68 N VS R GLN 498 OE1 Distance: 4.178922 - Hydrogen Bonds, 34 - L GLN 90 OE1 VS R TYR 505 OH Distance: 3.950707 - Hydrogen Bonds, 35 - L GLN 90 NE2 VS R TYR 505 OH Distance: 3.193306 - Hydrogen Bonds, 36 - L ASN 92 O VS R ARG 403 NE Distance: 4.834324 - Hydrogen Bonds, 37 - L ASN 92 O VS R ARG 403 NH1 Distance: 2.975243 - Hydrogen Bonds, 38 - L ASN 92 O VS R ARG 403 NH2 Distance: 3.211742 - Hydrogen Bonds, 39 - L ASN 92 OD1 VS R LYS 417 NZ Distance: 3.448454 - Hydrogen Bonds, 40 - L ASN 92 OD1 VS R TYR 453 OH Distance: 3.490970 - Hydrogen Bonds, 41 - L ASN 92 ND2 VS R TYR 453 OH Distance: 3.612599 - Hydrogen Bonds, 42 - L ASP 94 OD1 VS R ARG 403 NH2 Distance: 6.243375 - Attractive, 43 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 403 NE Distance: 6.752499 - Attractive, 44 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 403 CZ Distance: 6.251256 - Attractive, 45 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 403 NH2 Distance: 5.004944 - Attractive, 46 - L ASP 94 OD1 VS R ASP 405 OD1 Distance: 5.211578 - Repulsive, 47 - L ASP 94 OD1 VS R ASP 405 OD2 Distance: 5.866646 - Repulsive, 48 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ASP 405 OD1 Distance: 3.768405 - Repulsive, 49 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ASP 405 OD2 Distance: 4.085037 - Repulsive, 50 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 408 NE Distance: 6.665705 - Attractive, 51 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 408 CZ Distance: 6.656270 - Attractive, 52 - L ASP 94 OD2 VS R ARG 408 NH2 Distance: 6.165614 - Attractive,