IMMUNE SYSTEM/VIRAL PROTEIN CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF SARS-COV-2 RECEPTOR BINDING DOMAIN IN COMPLEX WITH ANTIBODIES CC12.1 AND CR3022: 0 - L ILE 28 CD1 VS C VAL 382 CG1 Distance: 4.013550 - Hydrophobic, 1 - L ILE 28 CD1 VS C LEU 390 CD2 Distance: 5.196698 - Hydrophobic, 2 - L ILE 28 CG1 VS C PHE 392 CD1 Distance: 5.150487 - Hydrophobic, 3 - L ILE 28 CG1 VS C PHE 392 CE1 Distance: 4.386173 - Hydrophobic, 4 - L ILE 28 CG1 VS C PHE 392 CZ Distance: 5.228385 - Hydrophobic, 5 - L ILE 28 CD1 VS C PHE 392 CD1 Distance: 5.086162 - Hydrophobic, 6 - L ILE 28 CD1 VS C PHE 392 CE1 Distance: 4.018837 - Hydrophobic, 7 - L ILE 28 CD1 VS C PHE 392 CZ Distance: 4.575648 - Hydrophobic, 8 - L ILE 28 CB VS C THR 430 CG2 Distance: 4.892558 - Hydrophobic, 9 - L ILE 28 CG1 VS C THR 430 CG2 Distance: 5.001340 - Hydrophobic, 10 - L ILE 28 CG2 VS C THR 430 CG2 Distance: 5.383716 - Hydrophobic, 11 - L ILE 28 CD1 VS C THR 430 CG2 Distance: 4.106415 - Hydrophobic, 12 - L ILE 28 CG1 VS C LEU 517 CB Distance: 5.061039 - Hydrophobic, 13 - L ILE 28 CG1 VS C LEU 517 CD1 Distance: 4.714555 - Hydrophobic, 14 - L TYR 32 OH VS C GLY 381 O Distance: 2.596249 - Hydrogen Bonds, 15 - L TYR 32 OH VS C VAL 382 N Distance: 4.658572 - Hydrogen Bonds, 16 - L TYR 49 CG VS C LYS 386 CD Distance: 5.062650 - Hydrophobic, 17 - L TYR 49 CD1 VS C LYS 386 CD Distance: 4.549142 - Hydrophobic, 18 - L TYR 49 CD2 VS C LYS 386 CB Distance: 5.375688 - Hydrophobic, 19 - L TYR 49 CD2 VS C LYS 386 CG Distance: 5.195878 - Hydrophobic, 20 - L TYR 49 CD2 VS C LYS 386 CD Distance: 4.870811 - Hydrophobic, 21 - L TYR 49 CE1 VS C LYS 386 CB Distance: 5.177405 - Hydrophobic, 22 - L TYR 49 CE1 VS C LYS 386 CG Distance: 4.847702 - Hydrophobic, 23 - L TYR 49 CE1 VS C LYS 386 CD Distance: 3.788938 - Hydrophobic, 24 - L TYR 49 CE2 VS C LYS 386 CB Distance: 4.395445 - Hydrophobic, 25 - L TYR 49 CE2 VS C LYS 386 CG Distance: 4.494626 - Hydrophobic, 26 - L TYR 49 CE2 VS C LYS 386 CD Distance: 4.170338 - Hydrophobic, 27 - L TYR 49 OH VS C LYS 386 O Distance: 4.642994 - Hydrogen Bonds, 28 - L TYR 49 OH VS C LYS 386 NZ Distance: 4.534975 - Hydrogen Bonds, 29 - L TRP 50 NE1 VS C GLY 381 O Distance: 4.492686 - Hydrogen Bonds, 30 - L TRP 50 CZ2 VS C VAL 382 CB Distance: 5.316754 - Hydrophobic, 31 - L TRP 50 CZ2 VS C VAL 382 CG1 Distance: 4.609967 - Hydrophobic, 32 - L TRP 50 CH2 VS C VAL 382 CB Distance: 5.299377 - Hydrophobic, 33 - L TRP 50 CH2 VS C VAL 382 CG1 Distance: 4.560877 - Hydrophobic, 34 - L TRP 50 CE3 VS C LEU 390 CD2 Distance: 4.722744 - Hydrophobic, 35 - L TRP 50 CZ2 VS C LEU 390 CD2 Distance: 5.267160 - Hydrophobic, 36 - L TRP 50 CZ3 VS C LEU 390 CB Distance: 5.354253 - Hydrophobic, 37 - L TRP 50 CZ3 VS C LEU 390 CG Distance: 4.952083 - Hydrophobic, 38 - L TRP 50 CZ3 VS C LEU 390 CD1 Distance: 5.248286 - Hydrophobic, 39 - L TRP 50 CZ3 VS C LEU 390 CD2 Distance: 3.736876 - Hydrophobic, 40 - L TRP 50 CH2 VS C LEU 390 CG Distance: 5.495122 - Hydrophobic, 41 - L TRP 50 CH2 VS C LEU 390 CD2 Distance: 4.090138 - Hydrophobic, 42 - L GLU 55 OE1 VS C LYS 386 NZ Distance: 2.964894 - Attractive, Hydrogen Bonds, 43 - L GLU 55 OE2 VS C LYS 386 NZ Distance: 4.511285 - Attractive, Hydrogen Bonds,