The discovery of motifs in biosequences is frequently torn between the rigidity of the model on the one hand and the abundance of candidates on the other. In particular, the variety of motifs described by strings that include dont care (dot) patterns escalates exponentially with the length of the motif, and this gets only worse if a dot is allowed to stretch up to some prescribed maximum length. This circumstance tends to generate daunting computational burdens, and often gives rise to tables that are impossible to visualize and digest. This is unfortunate, as it seems to preclude precisely those massive analyses that have become conceivable with the increasing availability of massive genomic and protein data. Although a part of the problem is endemic, another part of it seems rooted in the various characterizations offered for the notion of a motif, that are typically based either on syntax or on statistics alone. It seems worthwhile to consider alternatives that result from a prudent combination of these two aspects in the model.